Finland PM Sanna Marin expresses doubt over NATO's credibility due to a lack of ratification for Finland and Sweden's membership bid. Last Tuesday, the Finnish Prime Minister stated that a few members' delays in the accession of Helsinki and Stockholm are unsuitable for the military bloc's credibility.
Finland, Sweden Entry Stalled by Lack of Ratification
Marin cited the military bloc's open door policy that would have allowed the two Nordic nations to become official members, reported Republic World.
Claiming they have followed the criterion stating Turkey and Hungary's signal complicates the situation. Saying this in a press meeting with NATO's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg based on Sputnik.
The special military operation of Russia rolled into the Donbas to stop a significant attack by Kyiv's forces that prompted these Nordic countries to seek NATO protection on May 22 last year. By the end of 2022, only two members did not ratify them. These members are Turkey and Hungary, whose legislatures are needed to accept the applicants, cited The Star.
Tayyip Erdogan's government does not approve of their accession due to Helsinki, and Stockholm must surrender those connected to the Kurdistan Workers' Party. Ankara says they are terrorists that have threatened the government.
Turkish officials were offended by the demonstration in Stockholm in January when far-right extremists burned the Quran, which doomed the decision of Turkey. Ankara saw the act as Sweden's attitude to the Islamic nation and stating the Swedes have destroyed any chance to join. But Finland would have a better chance, though.
NATO's Credibility Affected by Acceptance of New Members
The military bloc has an open-door policy as the main principle that represents it. North Atlantic Treaty Organization's reason for existence is the defense of all members to counter threats to western security. It must keep the policy that all aspiring members meet all standards the bloc dictates.
It is an alliance of countries committed to collective defense against potential threats to their security. This criterion shows if the aspirant is fit for the bloc.
The policy was first discussed in 1995 via a document endorsing the organization's expansion with several conditions. One of these goals is the inclusion of democratic institutions and pushing stability in Europe. Admission of new members is determined by the open-door policy, which has added more countries as members and spread western influence as the US backs it.
Starting with a formal request that will be followed by conditions like democracy, human rules, rule of law with the ability to act militarily, with other requirements bundled in with the request to examine the accession of the applicant.
NATO Expansion Threatens the Russian Federation
Attempts to expand to encircle opponents like Russia via the Open-Door policy over time were inevitable in creating more tension than peace. Russia has warned the military bloc not to expand to its borders, but it has gone unheeded. Enlargement at the cost of peace and stability, but the bloc denies belligerence.
Finland PM Sanna Marin says that lack of ratification is damaging to NATO's credibility, but if that occurs more tension with Moscow would be next. These Nordic countries are the spearhead the US wants to use against Russia in the Arctic.
Related Article: NATO Bids of Finland, Sweden Will Take Longer, Hungary PM States
