Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca is currently facing a serious court case, dealing with compensation claims from 35 individuals who allege complications linked with its COVID-19-19 vaccine.
The vaccine, developed in collaboration with the University of Oxford, is now under scrutiny in the UK High Court, with claimants asserting that the vaccine is inherently "defective."
AstraZeneca's Legal Battle Over Rare Vaccine Side Effects
The focus of the controversy lies in the emergence of a rare side effect known as Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT), a condition causing blood clots. Tragically, at least 81 deaths have been linked to complications associated with this rare side effect, while numerous others have reported severe illnesses.
This legal challenge, potentially one of the most significant of its kind, may see AstraZeneca facing compensation payouts of up to £80 million ($101 million) if the court rules against the pharmaceutical company. According to reports from The Telegraph, additional claims are expected to be filed, further escalating the financial stakes for AstraZeneca.
The government, in its efforts to expedite the vaccine rollout during the pandemic, indemnified AstraZeneca and other vaccine manufacturers. Under the Vaccine Damage Payment scheme, individuals suffering adverse reactions, including those related to COVID-19 vaccines, are entitled to a one-off sum of $152,512 from the government. However, this compensation amount has come under scrutiny as potentially inadequate, particularly in cases involving severe outcomes.
Tory MP Sir Jeremy Wright emphasized the importance of addressing these cases and ensuring public confidence in the event of rare vaccine complications. The government was strongly encouraged to intervene and resolve these cases, guaranteeing assistance for those impacted.
The claimants are pursuing legal action under the Consumer Protection Act, contending that the vaccine's safety was misrepresented to recipients. AstraZeneca is staunchly defending itself against the claims, labeling them as 'confused' and 'wrong in law.' The pharmaceutical giant emphasizes the millions of lives its vaccine is believed to have saved during its initial year of deployment, as per Daily Mail.
AstraZeneca Excluded From UK Booster For Safety
Notably, the AstraZeneca vaccine is no longer part of the UK's booster program, with experts recommending the use of mRNA vaccines, such as Pfizer or Moderna, instead. Complications linked to the AstraZeneca jab have been cited on death certificates, raising concerns about the vaccine's safety.
Among the tragic cases, the death of Dr. Stephen Wright, who succumbed to a blood clot in the brain ten days after receiving his first AstraZeneca dose, and the passing of rock musician Lord Zion, whose preliminary death certificate attributed the cause to vaccine-induced complications, underscore the gravity of the situation.
As the legal battle unfolds, the government's indemnification, initial reports of vaccine complications, and the AstraZeneca vaccine's exclusion from the booster program continue to fuel the debate surrounding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. AstraZeneca, when contacted for comment, is yet to respond to these latest developments.
The cases, along with the increasing appeals, bring attention to the unusual but serious side effects linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine. This raises concerns about the intricate trade-off between the advantages of vaccination and the potential risks involved. The resolution of this legal dispute could have a profound effect on the future of litigation surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.
Related Article: TSA's Alleged CBP One App Initiative Questioned Sen. Hawley
