After introducing the four-bill Community Safety Act in 2012, members of the City Council are planning to rehash the proposed law by announcing a bill that will provide suspects with the freedom to reject NYPD officials when they want to conduct a search, according to a new report by New York Post.

If police officers don't have a search warrant or a probable cause for arrest, then they will need to get a written consent or audio permission if they wish to search a suspicious suspect anywhere in the city, according to the stringent legislation being introduced on Thursday, which is only practiced in West Virginia and Colorado.

According to the current law, while a potential criminal has the freedom to reject a cop's request for a search, police authorities are definitely not obligated to inform them of that right or seek written permission, Fox News reported.

"This is the exact kind of poorly conceived idea from this City Council that starts with the belief that aggressively fighting crime to keep communities safe is a bad thing," said Patrolmen's Benevolent Association president Patrick Lynch.

"This kind of proposal makes it appear that the council is more interested in protecting criminals than keeping communities safe."

At a hearing for the 2012 bill, which had sought to stem the rampant use of the "stop, question and frisk" policing tactic, Bloomberg legal counsel Michael Best had warned that the proposal would prevent police from searching suspects even when "officers have reason to fear for their own safety or the safety of the public."

Ed Mullins, president of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, also called the new bill "total insanity."

But with most people unwittingly giving their consent to being searched, the New York Civil Liberties Union argued that the bill was necessary, according to The Post,

For the bill to pass, the measure requires at least 26 votes before it can be passed on to Mayor de Blasio's desk for approval or veto. According to a spokesman, the mayor is planning to review the legislation.

Meanwhile, the bill's 21 current sponsors refused to provide The Post with a copy of the new bill, with some stating that they didn't want to preempt a planned press conference.